A blog from Burningham:
GRADING THE LEGISLATURE’S EDUCATION EFFORT
Dear friends:
(Note: In this
email, Mr. Burningham speaks in his own behalf; the point of view expressed in
this blog does not necessarily represent any organization of which he is a
part.)
With the 2014 Utah Legislative
session complete, a report card is due. (After all, if they insist on
grading schools, the Legislature itself ought to be graded.)
Many ways to grade exist; my grade is a personal evaluation of how the
Legislature did on school issues.
My grade: C-
I could be harsher; others have
been.
Bob Bernick, noted political
analyst and former Deseret News reporter now a regular writer for
UtahPolicy.com, was one. On his grading scale of 1-10 “with 10 being the
highest of success and promise” Bernick evaluated the session as follows:
Public education funding = 0
Public education reform = 5
An editorial evaluation in the Salt
Lake Tribune didn’t use grades, but observed: “Education fared better this
year than during the Great Recession but not as well as it should.”
The fact is the Utah Legislature
basically did more of the same. You know Utah ranks far below any
other state in per-pupil spending. The
best that can be said is the Utah Legislature’s commitment maintains that same
rock-bottom status.
Trying to paint a rosier picture,
some will brag about a 2.5 percent increase in the WPU or point to a total
dollar increase in education funding. But much of that increase in
funding is for new students; and the WPU increase will do little more than fund
basic education and employee health and retirement funds. The
appropriation of the Utah Legislature will not begin to pull Utah out of the
basement.
Politicians genuinely interested
in strengthening our education system must do something more about the
inadequate funding. The huge class sizes, limited professional
development, and meager teacher salaries are outrageous!
One effort to increase education
funding received much press. Speaker Becky Lockhart advocated
placing a one-to-one computer device in the hands of every student.
Estimates of the cost of such a program vary. Lockhart suggested between
$200 and $300 million would do the trick. The Governor’s Office, using a
study by his education commission, indicated that figure was way low!
The one-to-one device initiative
fell flat. Many observers fear that the gesture was mostly
posturing for political capital in the future. When Speaker Lockhart was
offered a measly $30 million by the Senate for the program, she walked out on
the talks. The ballyhooed effort “got none.”
All of us want to improve public
education. Lower class sizes, increased technology, better training for
teachers, and increased opportunities for pre-k students will take
significantly more dollars.
Our remarkable teachers are
laboring in huge classes, offered insufficient support, awarded nominal
compensation. Until the Utah Legislature and the Utah public is willing
to increase funding, we can expect little more than we now get. Utah’s
children deserve more! Our economy requires the best education
possible.
I keep hoping and looking for
political leadership that will act, not pontificate! Status quo
funding will not make the grade!
Sincerely,
Kim Burningham
No comments:
Post a Comment